Legal Opinion

Payette Farms Co. v. Conter

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1982No. 13586PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Chief Justice.

The defendants appeal the district court’s denial of defendants’ motion to amend its pleadings by adding a counterclaim seeking equitable relief from forfeiture of an installment land contract. The district court concluded that litigation of the counterclaim was precluded on the basis of res judicata. We affirm.

On March 29, 1978, Payette Farms Co. entered into an installment land contract for the sale of property known as Payette Farms to Louis A. Conter and his wife, Valerie J. Conter. Subsequently, following negotiations between the Conters and George Kirschner, an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Rutter v. McLaughlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Jones v. WatsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Clark v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Terry v. TerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. First Security Bank v. Absco Warehouse, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Gaither v. EG & G IDAHO, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Application of DowningIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gibson v. Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API