Schoenberg v. Forrest
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BROETER, Justice.
This is a case in which Jack Forrest sued Isidore Schoenberg for damages on account of an alleged breach of a written sales agency contract executed by -them of date December 30, 1947. By the terms of such contract Jack Forrest was designated sales agent for a jewelry item described as “Collar Bobs”, for a period of twenty years, on .a commission basis, over a territory composed of several states and portions of states, and substantially comprising the eastern half of the United , States. The paragraphs of such contract that are material for the disposition of this appeal are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southwest Battery Corp. v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Blagen v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Hewitt v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Totten v. HoughtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Atomic Fuel Extraction Corporation v. Slick's EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Housing Authority of City of Dallas v. HubbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Minneapolis-Moline Company v. PurserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Dial Temp Air Conditioning Company v. FaulhaberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Freeman v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.