Legal Opinion

Sil Evans v. George Wright

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 4, 1974No. 73-2404PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:

Primarily this appeal questions the extent of the power of a federal trial judge to comment on the evidence in the course of his charge to the jury. In order to understand what we hold it will be necessary to paraphrase much of the evidence. For just as jury instructions must always “be drawn with reference to the particular facts of the case on trial,” Collazo v. United States, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 241, 196 F.2d 573, 578, cert. denied, 343 U.S. 968, 72 S.Ct. 1065, 96 L.Ed. 1364 (1952), so also we cannot in telligently review an instruction in the abstract. Although…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Tipton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. Albert Junior HolleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  5. Doyle v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank JamesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Roy v. NELSON, Appellant, v. GREEN FORD, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. LozanoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Gonzalo Salvador Martin TelloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Gonzalo Salvador Martin TelloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API