Legal Opinion

In re 2003 Legislative Apportionment of the House of Representatives

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 2, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAUFLEY, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] As is required by the Maine Constitution, the 121st Maine Legislature undertook the reapportionment of the House of Representatives in, January 2003. Ultimately, a reapportionment plan was approved by the House and the Senate and was signed into law by Governor John E. Baldacci on April 15, 2003. Two challenges were filed with the Supreme Judicial Court, one challenging the plan’s composition of the Portland area districts, including Districts 114, 115, 117, and 120, and the other challenging the plan’s composition of District 36, comprising several towns and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Chapman v. MeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Davis v. BandemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176Supreme Court of Florida · 2012
  3. Kingman Park Civic Ass'n v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API