Legal Opinion
Selkridge v. United of Omaha Life Insurance
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided December 20, 2002No. CIV. 2001-143. No. CIV. 2002-73PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MOORE, District Judge.
On February 21, 2002, I granted defendant United of Omaha Insurance’s [“United of Omaha” or “defendant”] motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff Magarita Selkridge’s [“Selkridge” or “plaintiff’] common law claims were expressly preempted by section 514(a) of the Employee’s Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 [“ERISA”]. Plaintiff now moves this Court to amend its February 21st order. Specifically, Selkridge seeks to have me declare that her claims were dismissed without prejudice because they were only “completely preempted” by ERISA, thereby…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Margaret Stewart Jamey L. Paulson William Keith Laura Spencer Lee Callison Stephanie Glowa Terri Gorecki Dan Berryman v. U.S. BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Connie M. Tolle v. Carroll Touch, Incorporated, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Amp Incorporated, Formerly Known as Carroll Touch Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Margarita Selkridge v. United of Omaha Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- United States v. RoebuckDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2003
- Stewart v. Virgin Islands Board of Land Use AppealsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017