Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Patrick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1978No. 473PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

Appellant Anthony Patrick was convicted by a jury of selling the drug hydromorphone to an undercover agent in violation of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act.1 The Superior Court affirmed appellant’s conviction. This Court granted allocatur. Appellant contends that (1) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise timely appellant’s claim that he was denied the right to a speedy trial under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100 and the Sixth Amendment, (2) appellate counsel was ineffective for failing on appeal to the Superior Court to allege…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. WatersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. SherardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. GardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. EbertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. GlascoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API