Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1979No. 112PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

Appellant seeks relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act1 (PCHA) on the ground that he was denied *566effective assistance of counsel at trial.2 Appellant bases this claim on the fact that trial counsel failed to timely move for severance. We agree and reverse the judgment of sentence and order a new trial.

Appellant and co-defendant Westley Smith were charged with aggravated robbery and murder. They were jointly tried before a jury, found guilty of murder in the first degree and sentenced to life imprisonment.

After the case was called to trial and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. ViaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. UpshurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. BoykinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API