Commonwealth v. Miller
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant, who had been convicted upon a guilty plea, seeks a new trial to reduce murder in the first degree to voluntary manslaughter. He asks that the Court change the law so as to substitute a subjective test rather than an objective test in determining whether there was “serious provocation”.
After the court below gave consideration to psychiatric evidence it concluded that the objective standard had to be used, * referring to the statutory definition of “serious provocation” as “Conduct sufficient to excite an intense passion in a reasonable person,” Act of December 6, 1972, P.L.…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McCuskerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. OutlenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
4Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. PatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. CopelandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. GlascoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FrederickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.