Legal Opinion

Caraker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1986No. 14399PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his motion under Rule 27.26. By the motion he sought to vacate convictions of escape from confinement and second-degree burglary, and two convictions each of forgery and stealing. Movant had pled guilty to each charge.

In the trial court, movant had the burden of establishing his grounds for relief by a preponderance of the evidence. Rule 27.-26(f). Our review is limited to determining whether the trial court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment are clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j).

Movant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tatum v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Kline v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. James v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boxx v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Henderson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. WashingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Cook v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API