Olsen v. Bibb Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
In proceedings in the district court for Hennepin county for the dissolution of the Bibb Company, a corporation, William F. Olsen, a creditor, made a motion for an order setting aside an order appointing C. C. Wentworth trustee of said corporation, on the ground that the publication of notice in “Finance and Commerce” was insufficient to give the court jurisdiction over said Olsen, for the reason that “Finance and Commerce” was not a qualified newspaper as required by…
Read the full summary
In proceedings in the district court for Hennepin county for the dissolution of the Bibb Company, a corporation, William F. Olsen, a creditor, made a motion for an order setting aside an order appointing C. C. Wentworth trustee of said corporation, on the ground that the publication of notice in “Finance and Commerce” was insufficient to give the court jurisdiction over said Olsen, for the reason that “Finance and Commerce” was not a qualified newspaper as required by statute. The motion was heard on stipulated facts by Waite, J., and denied. From the order denying the motion, Olsen appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
The Bibb Company, a corporation, on December 23, 1911, petitioned the district court for Hennepin county for an order dissolving said corporation and appointing a trustee to collect and distribute its assets. The court ordered the petition heard at a special term to be held January 20, 1912, and that notice of the order be given by publishing a copy of Ihe same in a legal newspaper in the county of Hennepin for three successive weeks. Petitioner caused the order to be published in “Finance and Commerce” for three successive weeks, and the court on January 20, after hearing the evidence,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kerr v. HittIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Lynn v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Kellogg v. CarricoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Puget Sound Publishing Co. v. Times Printing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- Railton v. LauderIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burak v. DitsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Bowler v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Yaegar v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Culclasure v. Consolidated Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Legal Ledger, Inc. v. HodgsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.