Legal Opinion

Burak v. Ditson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 18, 1930No. 40222PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

The original notice in the instant action was published in time for the May, 1928, term of the district court of Iowa in and for Woodbury County. The notice was in proper form, and the statutory affidavit of publication was filed. The only question presented for determination is whether or not the "Daily Reporter” is a newspaper of general circulation, as the term is used in Section 11084, which in part reads:

"The publication must be of the original notice required for the commencement of actions # * * in some newspaper of general circulation published in the county where the petition is or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lynn v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Kellogg v. CarricoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Puget Sound Publishing Co. v. Times Printing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hanscom v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Baldwin v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico v. Negrón BarbosaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2005
  2. City of Corpus Christi v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. City of Postville, Iowa and Jason Meyer v. Upper Explorerland Regional Planning Commission, Martin Brennan, Kathy Campbell, Ray Whalen, Leon Griebenow, Andrew Wenthe, Karla Organist, Warren Steffen, Michael Kenedy, Janet McGovern, Dean Darling, Les Askelson, and Randy UhlSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Great Southern Media, Inc. v. McDowell CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State Ex Rel. Bowler v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API