United States v. Petersen
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR NEW TRIAL
JONES, Senior Judge:
The appellant was convicted of wrongfully possessing 932 grams of hashish in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The adjudged and approved sentence extended to dismissal, confinement at hard labor for two years, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances.
The appellant petitions for a new trial under the provision of Article 73, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 873, on the ground of newly discovered evidence; and assigns two errors on his appeal pursuant to review of his case under Article 66,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. BrowndUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- State v. GerdesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stokes v. United StatesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. LomaxU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. BelfieldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987