Doe v. Rutherford County, Tennessee, Board of Education
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.
Following a jury trial, the jury entered a verdict in favor of the defendant on all counts other than plaintiff Jane Doe’s Title IX retaliation claim. Pending before the court are several post-trial motions and related requests for costs, including the plaintiffs’ Motion for New Trial (Docket No. 202), the defendant’s Post-Trial Motion for Costs (Docket No. 184), plaintiff Jane Doe’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Docket No. 197), Jane Doe’s Bill of Costs (Docket No. 199), and the defendant’s Bill of Costs (Docket No. 201). For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- M.D. Ex Rel. Deweese v. Bowling Green Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Christopher Hicks v. Kathleen Crowley, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
- Murrah v. TDY Industries, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
- Rom E. Burton v. Harold E. KyleSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
- Sevy v. BarachDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.