Legal Opinion

State v. Peters

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 9, 1996No. A96A1086PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge.

Joseph D. Peters was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol when he failed field sobriety tests after having been stopped for speeding. The trial court granted Peters’ “Motion to Suppress and Motion In Limine,” excluding the test results on the ground that Officer Clayton had placed Peters under arrest but not informed him of his Miranda rights before administering the tests. The state appeals. We reverse.

“Factual and credibility determinations made by a trial judge after a suppression hearing or a motion in limine hearing to exclude evidence are accepted by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. State v. LevinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Lankford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chastain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Arce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. State v. PicotCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Hale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API