Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tom Thomas Organization, Inc. v. Reliance Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1976No. Docket 56442Published

1DissentLindemer, J.

This lawsuit involves a claim for payment under the provisions of an insurance contract. The Court of Appeals has held the insured’s (Tom Thomas) suit against the insurer (Reliance) is barred by a contractual limitation. We agree.

Tom Thomas, a producer of motion pictures, entered into an insurance contract with Reliance which contained the following clause:

”7. Suit: No suit, action or proceeding for the recovery of any claim under this policy shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless the same be commenced within twelve (12) months next after discovery by the Insured of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  2. Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Dahrooge v. Rochester German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Guastello v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Robinson's Home Outfitting Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API