Legal Opinion

Sprague Farms, Inc. v. Providian Corp.

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided June 19, 1996No. 96-3017PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

Hypothetical pleading.

How far does it go?

Not so far that a party may hypothetically plead the injury necessary to sustain claims in tort.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Parties

Sprague Farms, Inc. and Paxton Farms, Inc. are Nevada corporations doing business in Illinois. Paxton Farms is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sprague Farms, so they will be referred to simply as Sprague Farms. Webel Feeds, Inc. (Webel Feeds) operates a feed-mill near Pittsfield, Illinois. Webel Feeds is a subsidiary of Vigortone Ag Products, Inc (Vigortone). Providian Corporation (Providian) is an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hermitage Corp. v. Contractors Adjustment Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. CRUM & FORSTER INDEMNITY COMPANY v. SIDELINES TREE SERVICE, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Coral Realty, LLC v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API