Legal Opinion

State v. Brantley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1965No. 38725PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

Section 2915.111 provides punishment as for a misdemeanor “for a first offense” and punishment as for a felony (i. e., imprisonment for a maximum term of more than one year. See Sections 1.05 and 1.06, Revised Code) “for each subsequent offense.”

*141Defendant was opnvicted for a violation of that statute, which took place in October 1961. This conviction was in March 1962. Thereafter, defendant was indicted and convicted as a subsequent offender for a violation of that statute, which occurred in February 1962.

Defendant contends that he cannot he convicted as a subsequent offender because his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BowmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Staniforth v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. State v. McCormickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  4. Hawkins v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Harvey v. Myers, Supt.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State ex rel. Lipschutz v. Shoemaker, Director, Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Schilling v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  4. State v. Pendergrass (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. WintersOhio Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API