Legal Opinion

Staniforth v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1927No. 7772PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.

This is a proceeding in error from the Cuya-hoga Common Pleas instituted by William Staniforth to reverse the lower court. The question to be decided is whether, where a statute provides one sentence for the first offense and a trial to a court, and another sentence of a severer nature because of imprisonment and trial to a jury, there can be a trial and sentence under the statute for the second offense, while the proceedings with respect to the first offense are pending undecided before a court of appellate jurisdiction.

It is charged that there was error in the proceedings below, in that the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  2. State v. HaliskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. People v. SchallerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. State ex rel. Hunter v. JurgensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State v. BrantleyOhio Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API