Stewart v. Morris
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northern District of Illinois.
1Opinion of the Court
WOODS, Circuit Judge.
This is the second writ of error in this case. 60 U. S. App. 232, 32 C. C. A. 7, and 88 Fed. 461; 60 U. S. App. 557, 32 C. C. A 203, and 89 Fed 290. The hill of exceptions shows that counsel for the plaintiffs, who are here the plaintiffs in error, upon the delivery of the court’s charge to the jury “excepted specifically to each of the following propositions of law stated in said charge”:(1) “The rule of law is that an agent is not bound in a transaction if he acts for, and is understood as acting for, a principal, disclosed at the time as the principal in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stewart v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
3Cited by8 opinions
- Will v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Adams v. ShirkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Lafayette Bridge Co. v. OlsenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
- McNulta v. West Chicago Park Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Adams v. ShirkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.