Legal Opinion

Sasso v. Ram Property Management

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 28, 1984No. 63708PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

452 So.2d 932 (1984)

Fred V. SASSO, Petitioner,

v.

RAM PROPERTY MANAGEMENT and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, Respondents.

No. 63708.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 28, 1984.

Irvin A. Meyers and Sherry L. Davis of Meyers & Mooney, Orlando, for petitioner.

Randy Fischer of Haas, Boehm, Brown, Rigdon & Seacrest, Orlando, for respondents.

2Per curiam

This case comes before us on a petition to review a decision of the First District Court of Appeal, Sasso v. Ram Property Management, 431 So.2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The district court declared valid the state statute at issue here, and we therefore have…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kluger v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Sasso v. Ram Property ManagementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Acton v. Fort Lauderdale Hosp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Mahoney v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1983

4Cited by48 opinions

  1. Martinez v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Harris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Vogel v. Wells Fargo Guard ServicesTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Golden v. Westark Community CollegeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API