Legal Opinion

McLean Coal Co. v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1937No. Appeal, 190PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

The present controversy arises out of the passage of the “Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935” (C. 824, 49 Stat. 991; U.S.C.A. Title 15, Chapter 17, section 801), by the Congress of the United States, and the subsequent declaration of its unconstitionality: Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U. S. 238. The avowed purposes of the act were the stabilization of the bituminous coal mining industry and the promotion of its interstate commerce. In order to effectuate these purposes taxes were to be levied on the value of all coal mined, and certain rebates accorded…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Shepard v. BarronSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Ash v. GuieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  4. Dewhurst v. City of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  5. Bidwell v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Roberson v. PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. IngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Bituminous Coal Producers Board for District No. 4 v. Starr-Jackson Mining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Shenango Pottery Workers Ass'n v. Crawford, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API