Legal Opinion

Roberson v. Penland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1963No. 93PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The plaintiffs seek to 'have toe Oourt rescind toe deed and the -consent judgment by which toe parties settled their respective claims in the property -owned by Mrs. Gertrude Roberson Penland who died without lineal descendants on August 14, 1961. The defendant was -toe husband of toe testatrix. By (a) -of Item 2 of the will he was given ia legacy of $2,000.00. The remainder -of toe not inconsiderable estate w-a,s devised to toe plaintiffs -as shown by (b) of Item 2.

After toe probate of toe will the defendant filed -a dissent. Thereafter long negotiations -consisting of proposals and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Foulkes v. . FoulkesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1855
  5. Dudley v. StatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Perkins v. EskridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Wagshal v. SeligDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Gerdes v. ShewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State ex rel. North Carolina State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors v. Testing Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API