Legal Opinion

Baskurt v. Beal

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 2004No. S-11060PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Annette Beal purchased two adjoining parcels of property in 1991 for $95,000 and *1038$135,000. The promissory notes on the two parcels were secured by a single deed of trust covering both parcels. In 1994 Annette paid off the $95,000 note. In 1999 Annette defaulted on the $26,780.81 debt remaining on the other note. The trustee under the deed of trust foreclosed on both parcels. Sarah Baskurt, Robert Wainscott, and Allen Rosenthal purchased the property at the foreclosure sale for $26,781.81, one dollar over the remaining debt on the property. The trial…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Moeller v. Chun-Yen LienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Schroeder v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Ballentyne v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davin J. Anderson v. Alaska Housing Finance CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Bibi v. ElfrinkAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Farmer v. Alaska USA Title Agency, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Mark Thomas v. Joseph P. Casteel TrustAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Alaska Trustee, LLC v. AmbridgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API