Legal Opinion

Osco Drug, Inc. v. County of Orange

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1990No. G007961PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, Acting P. J.

We are asked to decide whether a downward adjustment to a base-year value on the current tax roll entitles a taxpayer to a refund of taxes paid for years prior to the adjustment. We conclude it does not.

I

Following a change in ownership in November 1980 (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 64, subd. (c)), two parcels of real property owned by Oseo Drugs, Inc., were reassessed by the Orange County Assessor. The new base year for both properties became 1981.

In 1984, Oseo filed an application for change in the 1984 secured roll assessment, controverting the assessor’s market…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Simms v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Armstrong v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. OstlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Steinhart v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Sea World, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Sunrise Retirement Villa v. DearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Metropolitan Culinary Services, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Ellis v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API