State v. Davis
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TATUM, Judge.
The appellants, Ronnie William Davis and Frederick William Brist were indicted for second-degree burglary. At the conclusion of the proof, the trial court directed the jury to return a verdict of guilt as to both appellants and submitted to the jury only the issue of punishment. The jury set punishment at not more nor less than 3 years in the penitentiary for each appellant. On this appeal, the appellants correctly state that the trial court erred in directing a verdict of guilt. They also make issues concerning the juvenile court procedure. We sustain the issue concerning…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BoboTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HaleTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Barry Wells v. Ron RickardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
- Shanta Fonton McKay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.