Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 13, 1982PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TATUM, Judge.

The appellants, Ronnie William Davis and Frederick William Brist were indicted for second-degree burglary. At the conclusion of the proof, the trial court directed the jury to return a verdict of guilt as to both appellants and submitted to the jury only the issue of punishment. The jury set punishment at not more nor less than 3 years in the penitentiary for each appellant. On this appeal, the appellants correctly state that the trial court erred in directing a verdict of guilt. They also make issues concerning the juvenile court procedure. We sustain the issue concerning…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BoboTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. HaleTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Barry Wells v. Ron RickardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  5. Shanta Fonton McKay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API