Industrial Commission v. Vigil
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Pringle.
Plaintiffs in error were defendants in the trial court. They will be referred to as follows: “Industrial Commission of Colorado as the ‘Commission’; State Compensation Insurance Fund as the ‘Fund,’ and Royal Gorge Packing Company as ‘Employer.’ ” Defendant in error Vigil will be referred to as “Claimant.”
On May 22, 1956, Claimant, while working for the Employer, sustained an injury compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, C.R.S. ’53, 81-1-1, et seq. An award of benefits for temporary total disability was entered on September 20, 1956. On June 20, 1957,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Street v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cain v. Industrial Commission of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Martin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Industrial Commission v. KokelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- Stahura v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Corlett v. CasertaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Profitt v. DeAtley-Overman, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Richards v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Walter Nashert and Sons v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Wade v. DworkinAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.