Legal Opinion
Martin v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 1956No. Civ. 21921PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE (Paul), J. pro tem. *
This is a proceeding brought by petitioners pursuant to section 5950 of the Labor Code to annul an award made by the respondent commission denying petitioners compensation for the death of Charles C. Martin.
The following relevant facts are either admitted, proved by uncontradicted evidence or, in ease of conflict in the evidence, sustained by substantial evidence:
Petitioners are respectively the widow and children of Charles C. Martin (hereinafter called Martin). Martin and his wife, the petitioner Leona K. Martin, were, at all times hereinafter mentioned, members…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Adler v. Board of Ed. of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hamilton v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Corlett v. CasertaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Montgomery v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Industrial Commission v. VigilSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Munn v. Southern Health Plan, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1989
- Walter Nashert and Sons v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.