Legal Opinion

Fernschild v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 24, 2017No. AC39418PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

The plaintiff, Matthew Fernschild, appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing his appeal from the decision of the defendant, the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles (commissioner), ordering a six month suspension of his license to operate a motor vehicle, pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b, 1 for his refusal to submit to a chemical alcohol test. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that there was substantial evidence in the record to support the finding of the hearing officer that the plaintiff refused to submit to a chemical analysis of his breath. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Roy v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Winsor v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Pizzo v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Wolf v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fernschild v. Comm'r of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API