Hawkins v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
On Motion to Modify Mandate.
1Opinion of the Court
WOODS, Circuit Judge.
The opinion of this court reversing the decree of the circuit court in this case was handed down at the October session, 1898. Hawkins v. Railway Co., 60 U. S. App. 561, 32 *323C. C. A. 198, 89 Fed. 266. The appellee now7 presents a “motion to modify the mandate,” but, instead of a direct and specific statement of the modification desired, begins by saying, “The appellee, the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, respectfully moves the modification of the mandate in the above entitled canse, and in support thereof, gives the court to know,” etc. This is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Kingsbury v. BucknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Southard v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Durant v. Essex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- In re Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- University of Nevada v. TarkanianNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Liberty Nat. Bank of Roanoke v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- State ex rel. Logan v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.