Legal Opinion
Miller v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1949No. 10848PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Chief Judge.
This case is here for the second time. At the first trial appellant was convicted by a jury upon an indictment charging that he “did knowingly fail to report for work of national importance,” in violation of Sections 305 and 311, Title 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix.
On the first appeal appellant raised the question that the Order, directing him to report for work of national importance, was invalid in that he had not received a preinduction physical examination within ninety days of the order so to report. This contention was rejected by us. Miller v. United States, 6 Cir., 169 F.2d…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Cox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Gibson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Illinois Power & Light Corporation v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jane Luna v. Ricky BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Finberg v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. EramdjianDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1957
- Luther Bailey v. Lee Henslee, Superintendent of Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Quinn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.