Legal Opinion
State v. Kortkamp
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 25, 2001No. C1-01-250PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
R.A. RANDALL, Judge
Appellant challenges his misdemeanor conviction of obstructing access to a parking space designated for physically disabled persons in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.346, subd. 1 (2000). The state also challenges the timeliness of appellant’s brief. Because we conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support appellant’s conviction, we reverse.
FACTS
Appellant Tom Kortkamp was convicted of obstructing access to a parking space designated for physically disabled persons in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.346, subd. 1 (2000). The district court found him guilty…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. NewstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. LussierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005