State v. Lussier
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Appellant asserts that his right to due process was violated because the state intentionally delayed charging him with first-degree burglary in order to obtain a substantially increased criminal history score and sentence. We affirm.
FACTS
On March 15, 2003, hours after police received a report of a home burglary, appellant Cheyenne Lussier was arrested. On March 18, 2003, in connection with this incident, the state charged Lussier with one count of second-degree burglary, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.582, subd. 2 (2002); one count of third-degree burglary, in violation…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Randall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. A. Guy Crouch, III and Michael J. FryeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MeredykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. MeredykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008