Legal Opinion

State v. Lussier

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 2005No. A04-1316PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

Appellant asserts that his right to due process was violated because the state intentionally delayed charging him with first-degree burglary in order to obtain a substantially increased criminal history score and sentence. We affirm.

FACTS

On March 15, 2003, hours after police received a report of a home burglary, appellant Cheyenne Lussier was arrested. On March 18, 2003, in connection with this incident, the state charged Lussier with one count of second-degree burglary, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.582, subd. 2 (2002); one count of third-degree burglary, in violation…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Randall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  5. United States v. A. Guy Crouch, III and Michael J. FryeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MeredykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  2. State v. MeredykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API