Legal Opinion
Donnelly v. Young
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 24, 1971No. 17231PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
Our opinion of June 18, 1971, is withdrawn, with the following substituted.
The case is one in which plaintiff Young recovered judgment for actual and exemplary damages of Donnelly and Harvill because of their tortious conduct occasioning expenditures, including attorneys’ fees, to avert loss of title to real estate. Donnelly and Harvill appealed.
Judgment affirmed.
At the time of trial the only plaintiff was Clifton Joe Young, and the only defendants A. D. Donnelly and J. B. Harvill. At the beginning stage, when suit was first filed on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Long v. KnoxTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Westcliff Co. v. WallTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Bryant v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Pond v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Ice Service Company v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sadler v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Pierson v. GFH Financial Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Grayton Koenig v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Hageman/Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P. v. Luth, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Wiese v. Pro Am Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.