Legal Opinion
Wiese v. Pro Am Services, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided July 20, 2010No. 14-08-00989-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE B. YATES, Justice.
Appellee Pro Am Services, Inc. (Pro Am) brought suit for conversion against appellant Aaron Wiese. Following a bench trial, the trial court found in favor of Pro Am and ordered Wiese to pay actual and punitive damages. Wiese raises six issues on appeal, arguing that Pro Am’s claims were barred by the statute of limitations for conversion and that there is no evidence or insufficient evidence to support several of the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Pro Am raises a cross issue and argues that the trial court erroneously calculated the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Miga v. JensenTexas Supreme Court · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Washington DC Party Shuttle, LLC, Party Shuttle Tours, LLC and Creativerse Internet Systems, LLC v. Iguide Tours, LLC, Tyree Cook, and Abise Eshetu, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- Michael Dodd and 3D Global Solutions, Inc. v. Brian J. Savino, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Motion Medical Technologies, L.L.C. v. Thermotek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A. v. RPK Capital XVI, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
- University General Hospital LP and Ascension Physician Solutions, LLC v. Prexus Health Consultants, LLC and Prexus Health, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.