Legal Opinion
Siegel v. 141 Bowery Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 26, 1976PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
The purchase agreement, dated November 1, 1971, whereby Henry Lewis, the sole stockholder of Henry Lewis Lamp Shade Corp. (Lamp Shade), sold 30 shares of stock constituting a half interest in Lamp Shade to his employee, Murray Siegel (petitioner), contained a broad arbitration clause, which provided, in part, that "any issue of any kind, *211any dispute, any difference or question of any kind relating in any manner whatsoever to this agreement, arising between the parties herein, shall be determined by arbitration”.
Thereafter, petitioner, Lewis, and Lamp Shade entered into a shareholders…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- G. E. Howard & Co. v. DaleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Mangan v. Terminal Transportation System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Moskowitz v. Surrey Sleep Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- In re Arbitration between Microtran Co. & EdelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- In re the Arbitration between Allied Van Lines, Inc. & Hollander Express & Van Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
3Cited by14 opinions
- Coleman v. TaubCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Miner v. WaldenNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. v. Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Stewart Becker, Ltd. v. HorowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Coleman v. TaubCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.