Legal Opinion
Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro v. Lerner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 15, 1994No. 92-16596PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises out of various transactions involving the Adam Grant building, 114 Sansome Street, San Francisco, where appellant, the law firm of Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro (Pillsbury), rents office space, and the effect of those transactions on the amount of rent to be paid by Pillsbury. Pillsbury appeals the district court’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal for failure to state a claim of its action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, against the past and present owners of the building and the real estate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. University Students Co-Operative Association George ProperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. v. Safeguard Self Storage, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2000
- Rajiv Khurana v. Innovative Health Care Systems, Inc. Karry Teel Carl Holden William Malone I.H.S. River Region Hospital of Vacherie, La., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- City and County of San Francisco v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1997
- In Re Sagent Technology, Inc., Derivative Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.