Legal Opinion

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 26, 1924No. 3475PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVAN A. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff was convicted of violating section 2 of the Hours of Service Act (34 Stat. 1415 [Comp. St. § 8678]). The material portions of the act, so far as this case is concerned, read as follows:

“Provided, that no operator, train dispatcher, or other employee who by the use of the telegraph or telephone-dispatches, reports, transmits, receives, or delivers orders pertaining to or affecting train movements shall be required or permitted to be or remain on duty for a longer period than nine hours in any twenty-four hour period in all towers, offices, places, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. United States v. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
  4. Chicago & A. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Baltimore & O. R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  2. United States v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, D. Maryland · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API