Legal Opinion
Andrew Pickholtz v. Rainbow Technologies, Inc. And Software Security, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 29, 2002No. 01-1173PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Andrew Pickholtz appeals from the decisions of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California denying his motion for summary judgment of infringement and granting the defendants’ (“Rainbow’s”) motion for summary judgment of noninfringement of Pickholtz’s U.S. Patent 4,593,353. Pickholtz also appeals from the denial of his motion for attorney fees resulting from Rainbow’s discovery misconduct. Because the court erred in construing the claims of the '353 patent, we reverse the court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Rainbow. Because there…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Invitrogen Corp. (Formerly Known as Life Technologies, Inc.) v. Clontech Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Preseault V. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Liquid Dynamics Corporation v. Vaughan Company, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.