John Hardy v. Reynolds and Reynolds Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
In this diversity contract action, plaintiff John Hardy challenges the ruling of the district court granting summary judgment to his former employer, Reynolds & Reynolds Company. Because the sales commission agreement between the parties gives Reynolds & Reynolds the discretion to modify it, and because Hardy was not responsible for procuring the contested sale through his individual efforts as required by the agreement, we conclude that the district court properly resolved the issue before it. In addition, we hold that the choice-of-law question raised by- the plaintiff for the first time on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Certified Restoration Dry Cleaning Network, L.L.C. v. Tenke Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Kyle Ciminillo v. Thomas Streicher Daniel Hills Richard Janke, Gerald Knight City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thorn v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2015
- Wright v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2015
- Midstate Fin. Co. v. PeoplesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2018
- Autotech Technology Development, Incorporated v. Carbopress SpaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Workers of America v. General Motors, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.