Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1942No. 6424PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

Frank Brooks was convicted of grand larceny and appeals. He urges a reversal upon two grounds: (1) The evidence is insufficient to connect appellant with commission of the larceny; and (2) The evidence does not justify a holding that the property exceeded $50 in value.

In June, 1941, appellant with two companions went on a fishing trip in a truck owned by appellant. They parked the truck on the bank of the Little Bear River, near a bridge, in Cache County, and started fishing. Shortly after Max Thompson and his wife, also on a fishing trip, parked their car by the side of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. PotelloUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  2. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. State v. BarrettaUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Shriver v. Union Stock Yards National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Walker v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. EastmondUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State v. PachecoUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. BartonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  5. State v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API