Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 17, 1936No. 26063PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

In this action the pet'ti oners. E. L. Robinson, Gibson & Zohniser Oil Corporation, and the Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, present for review an order and award of the State Industrial Commission by which the respondent Roy Fisher, as claimant, was granted compensation for permanent partial disability under the “other cases” clause of section 13356, O. S. 1931 (a part of the Workmen’s Compensation Law).

In presenting their case the petitioners (assert, in substance, that compensation should have been denied in this ease because .(1) claimant failed to file a claim or give written…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Protho v. NetteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Pine v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Steffens Ice Cream Co. v. JarvisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Tippett & Bond v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. OsbornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walker v. HogueIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Ice v. GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corporation v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Bennett v. Scrivner, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Grimshaw Const. Co. v. BiasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API