Legal Opinion
Ball v. Federal Insurance Company
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided May 12, 2021No. 4:18-cv-04008Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION RANDY BALL, 4:18-CV-04008-KES Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING vs. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Plaintiff, Randy Ball, brought a lawsuit against defendant, Federal Insurance Company, alleging that Federal acted in bad faith when it denied Ball’s workers’ compensation claim. Docket 1. Federal moves for summary judgment. Docket 62. Federal argues that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because its decision to terminate coverage in September 2014 was debatable. Docket 63 at…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.