Legal Opinion

Neugass v. Terminal Cab Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1931PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

The plaintiff was injured while a passenger in a taxicab. She claims to have observed the name of the defendant corporation on the cab in which she Was riding. That cab collided with another. Plaintiff did not obtain sufficient information to identify the second cab. She has brought this action against the defendant corporation and “ John Doe,” the latter being a fictitious name to designate the owner of the second cab. Plaintiff then obtained an order for the examination before trial of the defendant corporation for the purpose of framing a complaint. The corporation was directed to appear…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chirac v. ReinickerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Britton v. . LorenzNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Bacon v. . FrisbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Agawam Bank v. . StreverNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Richards v. RichardsNew York Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dike v. DikeWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In re the Appointment of a Guardian for Jacqueline F.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Sapp v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re HeileOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. In Re Albert Lindley Lee Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API