Legal Opinion
Fleming v. Bank of Madison
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1968No. 319Published
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The general rule is set forth in Restatement, 2 Property, p. 961, sec. 231, wherein it is stated:
“When an attempted prior interest fails because the person to whom it is limited renounces it, succeeding interests are accelerated except when (a) the terms and circumstances of the limitation manifest a contrary intent . . . .”
In Will of Uihlein (1953), 264 Wis. 362, 378, 59 N. W. 2d 641, we quoted with approval from 4 Page, Wills (lifetime ed.), p. 89, sec. 1390:
“ ‘Where the enjoyment of possession by the remain-derman is postponed until after the determination of the particular estate and for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Uihlein v. UihleinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Sueske v. SchofieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
- Will of McIlhattanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- In re the Estate of GrahamNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- Borchert v. MuellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.