Legal Opinion

Borchert v. Mueller

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

Upon the hearing on the petition, and upon this áppeal, the appellant relied upon the case of Will of McIlhattan, 194 Wis. 113, 117, 216 N. W. 130, wherein this court said:

“ ‘When the purposes for which an express trust shall have been created shall have ceased the estate of the trustee shall also cease.’ Sec. 231.23, Stats.
“Upon the election of the widow and the death of Fred Mcllhattan the purposes of the trust ceased, and the estate of the trustees also ceased under the statute quoted. It is a general rule of law that the election of the widow has the same effect as her death, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sherman v. FlackIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. In re Schulz's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Rench v. RenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. Hesseltine v. PartridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. McCollum v. McCollumNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. RaimeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Fleming v. Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API