Legal Opinion
Dollac Corporation v. Margon Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 25, 1960No. 12869_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Dollac Corporation, and defendant, Margon Corporation, are both manufacturers of artificial doll eyes. Plaintiff sued defendant in the court below for infringement of the Brudney Patent, No. 2,753,660, “Doll’s Eyes”, of which it is the assignee. Defendant answered attacking the validity of the Brudney Patent and denying infringement, and counterclaimed charging plaintiff with infringement of the Samolewitz Patent, No. 2,657,500, of which it is the assignee. Plaintiff then filed a reply and counterclaim; in the former it denied infringement and challenged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- R. M. Palmer Company v. Luden's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Dollac Corporation v. Margon CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
- Advance Business Systems & Supply Co. v. SCM CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
- Telex Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1973
- Eversharp, Inc. v. Fisher Pen Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1961
- Gold Fuel Service, Inc., a Corporation of New Jersey v. Esso Standard Oil Company, a Corporation, of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.