Legal Opinion
Dollac Corporation v. Margon Corporation
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 11, 1958No. Civ. 603-56PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM F. SMITH, District Judge.
This is primarily and essentially a civil action under the patent laws, particularly Sections 281, 283 and 284, of Title 35 U.S.C.A., and the issues are those usual in litigation of this character. The plaintiff filed a complaint in which it charged the defendant with the infringement of Patent No. 2,753,660, of which the plaintiff, as the assignee of one Harry Brudney, is admittedly the owner. The defendant filed an answer and counterclaim; in the former it denied infringement and challenged the validity of the patent, and in the latter it introduced two new…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
- Advance Business Systems & Supply Co. v. SCM CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
- Telex Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1973
- Gold Fuel Service, Inc., a Corporation of New Jersey v. Esso Standard Oil Company, a Corporation, of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Burkhead v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.