Legal Opinion
Hope Basket Co. v. Product Advancement Corp. Product Advancement Corp. v. Hope Basket Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 29, 1951No. 11242_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Circuit Judge.
This action was filed by the Hope Basket Company and the Walter Verhalen Company to determine their rights as licensees under five royalty license agreements executed April 1, 1930, and to have Schmidtke Basket Patent No. 1,895,586 declared invalid. They have appealed from a ruling adverse to their claims under the license agreements and upholding the validity of the patent. The defendants below, Product Advancement Corporation and St. Joe Machines, Inc., have appealed from that portion of the judgment which denied them a recovery of damages and sought by way of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Edward Katzinger Co. v. Chicago Metallic Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Bank of Utah, a Utah Corporation, and Bank of Ben Lomond, a Utah Corporation v. Commercial Security Bank, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Wilson & Co. v. United Packinghouse Wkrs. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
- Hope Basket Co. v. Product Advancement Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
- Uneeda Doll Co., Inc. v. Regent Baby Products Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.