Legal Opinion

Kay v. United of Omaha Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 7, 2014No. 12-2092, 12-2140UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge.

Sherman Kay died before he paid his last life insurance premium. His insurer, United of Omaha, denied death benefits to his wife, Claire Kay, and the company he owned, Claymore Construction. Claire and Claymore sued United for breach of contract and won at trial. United now challenges numerous decisions of the district court. We vacate and remand for a new trial.

I

In 2001, Sherman Kay bought a $2 million life-insurance policy from United. At the time of his death, the plaintiffs — Claire Kay and Claymore Construction (collec tively, “Kay”) — were the policy’s joint…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Imwalle v. Reliance Medical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Ortiz v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claire Kay v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. LinTech Global, Inc. v. Can Softtech, Inc. and Swapna ReddygariDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API