Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pacific Northwest Public Service Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

There are four assignments of error predicated upon the refusal of the court to give certáin. instructions requested by appellant.

The original bill of exceptions, after quoting each requested instruction, shows as follows:

“The court refused to instruct the jury as requested in the foregoing instruction, and an exception was duly allowed to the refusal of the court to instruct the jury as requested by said defendant in said instruction. ’ ’

Some time after the bill of exceptions was settled and allowed, on motion of plaintiff, who deemed that the bill of exceptions was not in accordance with…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Emmons v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Knahtla v. Oregon Short Line, etc., Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Marshall v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Maynard v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Boothe v. Farmers & Traders Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Fehely v. SendersOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State of Oregon v. KaderOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Garrett v. Eugene Medical CenterOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Whisnant v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API